- #Xbench freezes on thread test how to#
- #Xbench freezes on thread test mac os x#
- #Xbench freezes on thread test mac os#
- #Xbench freezes on thread test install#
- #Xbench freezes on thread test drivers#
Pretty bad, but not nearly as bad as Tiger was – at least the sound isn’t breaking up. It’s not good, but it is definitely better. And yes, the video is smoother in Panther. On to Panther, which tends to have a lower CPU load. Under Tiger, very low frame rate and jerky. Next up: Move the hard drive from the 450 MHz G4 to my 350 MHz Blue and White G3 with 384 MB of RAM and view the same video. Things are a bit worse under 10.2 Jaguar and sometime a bit jerky, even worse than under Tiger. If anything, it seems a bit smoother in 10.3 Panther, which makes sense, since Tiger uses more CPU cycles for system tasks. Compared with my dual 1 GHz Power Mac G4, which is very smooth, the 450 MHz dual seems to be running at a lower frame rate under Tiger. I viewed my favorite video, Mac Beautiful, with each OS. I can’t say I have much experience with online video using older, slower Macs, but I happen to have a dual 450 MHz Power Mac G4 with 768 MB of RAM next to me at the moment with Mac OS X 10.2.8, 10.3.9, and 10.4.11 installed. Is there hope for them? Hard drive speed? I just don’t know. They all have trouble running video, like say YouTube. I love these older Macs, I have a Dual USB iBook G3, a Blue and White G3, and a couple of older Power Mac G4s. I have an idea for an article, because it’s an issue that I have a hard time finding info.
#Xbench freezes on thread test mac os#
#Xbench freezes on thread test how to#
The timing was started using a stopwatch from the moment the "Save" button was clicked until the encoding finished.The most important part of this mailbag is the analysis of how to get the best performance from YouTube an an older Mac. mov file and exported it for iPod using all of the default Quicktime Pro settings. The final set of benchmarks that we ran on these three troopers was a Quicktime encoding benchmark. Still, the MacBook Pro performed a little better than I expected after having watched it chug through the tests.
#Xbench freezes on thread test drivers#
The MacBook Pro looks to have done exceedingly well in both of the shading tests, until you consider that the Dell's Windows XP Cinebench scores for those two tests blew the MacBook Pro out of the water while running on graphics drivers that aren't hacked. On the single and multiple CPU rendering tests, it performed very similarly to the Dell running OS X (to stay consistent with the rest of our benchmarks with that machine). Watching Cinebench run on the MacBook Pro hurt a little, even though it appears to have outperformed the other two machines on the various tests. Cinebench is interesting because it does a number of 3D tests based off of Cinema 4D and is available for both Mac and Windows, so it can be very representative of a machine's capabilities against one another.
In addition to XBench, we also decided to run Cinebench 9.5, which is now also available in Universal Binary. All other scores appeared to remain mostly constant, with the only other noticible change being in the Quarts Graphics Test score, which increased to 79.11 from 51.02.
#Xbench freezes on thread test install#
I also ran XBench with Beam Synchronizing disabled on the MacBook Pro (which requires you to install the Developer Tools) and got a score of 161.15 in the User Interface test, a significant increase from the previous score of 27.52.
#Xbench freezes on thread test mac os x#
One can only imagine what Mac OS X would be like on it if it were actually supported! Without that score factored in, the Dell performed pretty well comparatively. Overall scores for the three machines were about what was expected, with the MacBook Pro standing at 53.71, the AlBook G4 at 45.73, and the Dell P4 at 22.96a score no doubt affected by the exceptionally poor performance in the User Interface test. Isn't it nice to have a real FSB in an Apple portable? On the memory test, the MacBook Pro's RAM was significantly faster than the PowerBook G4. The CPU test results were rather close for all three with some minor differences, and of course the MacBook Pro spanked the AlBook on the Thread test (while beating the Dell by a smaller margin). Both the AlBook and the Dell scored higher on the disc test, which makes sense in the case of the AlBook, since it has a 7200rpm drive. For one, the Aluminum PowerBook G4 mysteriously scored higher on the User Interface test than both of the other machines. Some of these results are surprising, and some are not.
0 kommentar(er)
